[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1y6yw25mq.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:36:29 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org, arjan@...radead.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
serue@...ibm.com, srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ftrace: trace single pid for function graph tracer
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
>> > # echo $$ > /debugfs/tracing/set_ftrace_pid
>> > # echo function_graph > /debugfs/tracing/current_tracer
>> >
>> > Will cause only the current task to be traced. Note, the trace flags are
>> > also inherited by child processes, so the children of the shell
>> > will also be traced.
>>
>> Where did we end up on the pids-arent-unique issue? Gave up?
>
> Nah, patch 2 opens the door for a solution. I'm just pawning the work off
> to the container folks ;-)
The way patch 2 uses pids is just stupid. It has nothing to do with
pids aren't unique. You do a full walk of the process list instead
of using the hash table.
It makes me think that task->pid really should go away because with it
there people don't bother to look and see how things normally work.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists