lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2008 21:29:10 -0500 (EST)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, arjan@...radead.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	serue@...ibm.com, srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ftrace: trace single pid for function graph tracer


On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> 
> The way patch 2 uses pids is just stupid.  It has nothing to do with
> pids aren't unique.  You do a full walk of the process list instead
> of using the hash table.

The way patch 2 uses the pids is stupid, it was just the easiest way to 
implement it correctly ;-)  I work with, do it stupid but correct first, 
then optimize.

> 
> It makes me think that task->pid really should go away because with it
> there people don't bother to look and see how things normally work.

This is far from a fast path, and I can easily fix it. The hard work was 
the rest of the patch not this part. I even did it stupid knowing that I 
would be rewriting it to handle namespaces. I stated that this needed to 
be fixed in the patch itself.

One thing I never got an answer for, using the namespace pid path, can I 
still select the idle task to trace, i.e. pid == 0.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ