[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081204.150443.30081008.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:04:43 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: will.newton@...il.com
Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Flags should be accessed via the foo_bit
interfaces
From: "Will Newton" <will.newton@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:50:29 +0000
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > @@ -515,10 +515,9 @@ sl_close(struct net_device *dev)
> > struct slip *sl = netdev_priv(dev);
> >
> > spin_lock_bh(&sl->lock);
> > - if (sl->tty) {
> > + if (sl->tty)
> > + clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &sl->tty->flags);
> > /* TTY discipline is running. */
> > - sl->tty->flags &= ~(1 << TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP);
> > - }
>
> The indentation of the comment looks like it might be wrong here.
Indeed. In fact it's now transposed with the operation it describes,
and thus the braces should probably be preserved here as well.
Alan could you please fix this up?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists