[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <493AF2EE.20605@lwfinger.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:47:26 -0600
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@....de>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
John W Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] p54usb: rewriting rx/tx routines to make use of
usb_anchor's facilities
Christian Lamparter wrote:
>
> Alan, I've got a question about:
> "Create and initialize a usb_anchor structure, and each time you create
> a new URB, call usb_anchor_urb(). Then you can free the URB as soon as
> it is submitted; the anchor will keep it pinned until it completes, and
> it is automatically removed from the anchor when the completion routine
> is called."
>
> Do we have to call usb_free_urb again, if we're resubmitting the urb in the
> complete callback? (the code what I'm referring to is p54u_rx_cb in p54usb.c)
I am very interested in the answer to this question. My interpretation is that
you cannot resubmit the urb after it has been posted to usb_anchor_usb() because
the USB core will have deleted it, and that the callback routine will have to
allocate a new urb, anchor it, and then free it as well.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists