[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812062250.43445.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:50:42 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Rework default handling of suspend and resume
On Saturday, 6 of December 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > prefer it to go next. After it's been merged, I'm going to add the mandatory
> > suspend-resume things (save state and go to a low power state on suspend,
> > restore state on resume) to the new framework in a separete patch.
> >
> > Is this plan acceptable?
>
> I have at least two drivers I look after where if you put the device into
> D3 you lost. We survive because on a successful suspend/resume sequence
> the BIOS puts it back coming out of suspend but that means we must not
> put those devices into D3 ourselves ever - including during a suspend
> before we are 100% comitted to the suspend completing or reboot.
We can mark them as devices not to put into D3. There already is a
mechanism for that in place.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists