linux-kernel - Re: next-2008-11-09: s390 vs ->ioctx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081209071305.GO23742@kernel.dk>
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:13:06 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jmoyer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: next-2008-11-09: s390 vs ->ioctx_list

On Tue, Dec 09 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>   CC      arch/s390/mm/pgtable.o
> arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c: In function 's390_enable_sie':
> arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c:266: error: invalid operands to binary ||
> arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c:282: error: invalid operands to binary ||
> 
> This is because ->ioctx_list turned from pointer to a hlist, some more locking
> and different check required.

Already posted a patch for this on friday, the branches have now been
updated.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/