linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/15] kmemleak: Add memleak_alloc callback from alloc_large_system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1229017098.332.45.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:38:18 +0000
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] kmemleak: Add memleak_alloc callback from
	alloc_large_system_hash

On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 09:30 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 09:50 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > Since alloc_large_system_hash() is using bootmem (and is called early),
> > > I'm a little surprised that it is OK to call into memleak_alloc() which
> > > uses kmem_cache_alloc().  Is the slab even set up at this point?
> > 
> > It doesn't need to be. Early callbacks like this are logged by kmemleak
> > in a buffer and properly registered once the slab allocator is fully
> > initialised (slab initialisation needs to allocate some memory for
> > itself as well).
> 
> Ahh, thanks for the clarification.  Could you add something to the code
> to this effect?

Do you mean a comment? I can do this.

-- 
Catalin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/