[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1229017506.17206.7.camel@nimitz>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:45:06 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] kmemleak: Add memleak_alloc callback from
alloc_large_system_hash
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:38 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 09:30 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 09:50 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > Since alloc_large_system_hash() is using bootmem (and is called early),
> > > > I'm a little surprised that it is OK to call into memleak_alloc() which
> > > > uses kmem_cache_alloc(). Is the slab even set up at this point?
> > >
> > > It doesn't need to be. Early callbacks like this are logged by kmemleak
> > > in a buffer and properly registered once the slab allocator is fully
> > > initialised (slab initialisation needs to allocate some memory for
> > > itself as well).
> >
> > Ahh, thanks for the clarification. Could you add something to the code
> > to this effect?
>
> Do you mean a comment? I can do this.
Yeah, something like
/*
* kmemleak doesn't actually allocate memory when called this early
* so the GFP_ATOMIC here is actually meaningless, but consistent
* with the rest of this function.
*/
Maybe that's too verbose. :)
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists