lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020812111147h77587bd2t9dbe03f132cb1153@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:47:57 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Dave Hansen" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] kmemleak: Add memleak_alloc callback from alloc_large_system_hash

On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:38 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> Do you mean a comment? I can do this.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Yeah, something like
>
> /*
>  * kmemleak doesn't actually allocate memory when called this early
>  * so the GFP_ATOMIC here is actually meaningless, but consistent
>  * with the rest of this function.
>  */
>
> Maybe that's too verbose. :)

I'd suggest just doing a separate kmemleak_early_alloc() hook without
the gfp flag.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ