linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.29] block: simplify and fix empty barrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:26:14 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.29] block: simplify and fix empty barrier

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 12 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> Jens, did you have time to review this?
>>> Sorry yes, I thought I had sent a reply on this already, weird. I
>>> committed it last week, and it's tested fine here.
>> Ah... thanks.  Next patchset brewing then.  :-)
> 
> Excellent. Are you going forward with the explicit peek/dequeue
> interface for elv_next_request()? If not, then I'll put some time into
> that as I think it needs doing soon. But if you are, I'll happily do
> something else instead.

I'm actually working on that.  As you opposed to the original
proposal, I'm changing the approach, so it would be great if we don't
collide on the same area.

Thanks.  :-)

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/