linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.29] block: simplify and fix empty barrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:28:49 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.29] block: simplify and fix empty barrier

On Fri, Dec 12 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 12 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 12 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>>> Jens, did you have time to review this?
> >>> Sorry yes, I thought I had sent a reply on this already, weird. I
> >>> committed it last week, and it's tested fine here.
> >> Ah... thanks.  Next patchset brewing then.  :-)
> > 
> > Excellent. Are you going forward with the explicit peek/dequeue
> > interface for elv_next_request()? If not, then I'll put some time into
> > that as I think it needs doing soon. But if you are, I'll happily do
> > something else instead.
> 
> I'm actually working on that.  As you opposed to the original
> proposal, I'm changing the approach, so it would be great if we don't
> collide on the same area.

Ah nice, sounds promising! I wont step on your toes, and it'd be silly
to waste time working on the same bits, so don't worry about that.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/