[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081215123801.GA32485@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:38:01 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH crypto] AES: Add support to Intel AES-NI
instructions
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 04:21:06PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > a. Do not touch SSE state in soft_irq
> > b. Disable/restore soft_irq in kernel_fpu_begin/kernel_fpu_end
> > c. Use a per-CPU data structure to save kernel FPU state during
> > soft_irq.
> >
> > The mothod a is used in patch.
>
> Could you run the tcrypt speed test on this and measure the
> difference between the native AES vs. the fallback? Depending
> on the difference I think we'd want to consider b) or c).
Here's another option
d. When we're in interrupt context, schedule a task to perform
the encryption asynchronously.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists