[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081215162148.87fd38a5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:21:48 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hugh@...itas.com, jlan@....com,
jpirko@...hat.com, jlim@....com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] introduce get_mm_hiwater_xxx(), fix
taskstats->hiwater_xxx accounting
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:05:24 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> --- K-28/include/linux/sched.h~HIWATER 2008-12-02 17:12:40.000000000 +0100
> +++ K-28/include/linux/sched.h 2008-12-03 18:17:18.000000000 +0100
grumble
> +#define get_mm_hiwater_rss(mm) max((mm)->hiwater_rss, get_mm_rss(mm))
This evaluates its argument thrice.
> +#define get_mm_hiwater_vm(mm) max((mm)->hiwater_vm, (mm)->total_vm)
This evaluates its argument twice.
was sched.h the appropriate header in which to implement these? Maybe...
But they're only ever _used_ in kernel/tsacct.c, so do they actually
need to be implemented in any .h file?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists