[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081216170209.GC410@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:02:09 -0500
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] preadv & pwritev syscalls.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:48:58PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> i.e. the ordering of the splitted argument depends on the os endianness?
> What is the reason for this?
>
Eh? The splitting will occur at the C ABI level, not as a result of
glibc (though, it could be done that way if you really wanted, but then
you're just moving the wrapper up the chain.)
A 64-bit value on a 32-bit machine will look like, in a register pair,
like it looks in memory, with MSB/LSB ordering.
> I'd prefer to have the ordering coded explicitly instead, like this:
>
> asmlinkage int compat_sys_pwritev(unsigned long fd,
> const struct compat_iovec __user *vec, unsigned long vlen,
> unsigned pos_low, unsigned pos_high)
> {
> loff_t pos = pos_low | (loff_t)pos_high << 32;
> [ ... ]
>
Sadly this isn't possible without a wrapper unless you can guarantee
it was passed low high instead of high low. Unless you munge it in
userspace, you can't.
regards, Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists