[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b040c32a0812170007s59600707h5a8597a1cbe9cc21@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:07:12 -0800
From: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: convert rdtscll() to use __native_read_tsc
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> agreed mostly, with this twist: vdso inlining dependencies should be
> expressed explicitly, via:
>
> native_vread_tsc()
>
> but we can also make native_read_tsc() __always_inline [it's a single
> instruction with basically no preparatory halo around that instruction]
> and document the vdso detail there.
Given that vdso already uses the inline version of __native_read_tsc,
we don't really have churn all that code around. I also take your
analysis as there is no issue in converting rdtscll() to
__native_read_tsc(). Would it be possible for you to merge the patch
then?
- Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists