[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081217190826.GA25890@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:08:26 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipc namespaces: implement support for posix
msqueues
Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com):
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 11:55 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > -void free_ipc_ns(struct kref *kref)
> > +void put_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
> > {
> > - struct ipc_namespace *ns;
> > + if (ns && atomic_dec_and_lock(&ns->count, &mq_lock)) {
> > + mq_clear_sbinfo(ns);
> > + spin_unlock(&mq_lock);
> > + mq_put_mnt(ns);
> > + free_ipc_ns(ns);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> OK, I see now why you wanted to remove the kref and add an atomic_t.
> That's probably worth a sentence in the patch description.
Good point, will do.
> I know that atomic_dec_and_lock() can be a nice logical thing to do, but
> is it necessary here? Basically, is there something that happens under
> mq_lock that can re-raise the ns->count?
A racing task from another ipc namespace can open a mq file through
the VFS and thereby bump the ipc's refcount. Will comment that here and
in the patch description.
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists