[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081217020435.GA2866@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:04:35 -0800
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: oleg@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, roland@...hat.com
Cc: daniel@...ac.com, bastian@...di.eu.org, xemul@...nvz.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sukadev@...ibm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH][v2] SEND_SIG_NOINFO: Masquerade si_pid when crossing
pid-ns boundary
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:51:43 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] SEND_SIG_NOINFO: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid-ns boundary
For SEND_SIG_NOINFO, si_pid is currently set to the pid of sender
in sender's active pid namespace. But if the receiver is in a
different namespace, that given pid number would be incorrect.
Eg: when parent sends the 'pdeath_signal' to a child that is in
a descendant pid namespace, we should set si_pid 0.
Changelog[v2]
- Moved change from task_pid() to task_tgid() to separate patch
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 2a64304..d11e5f8 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -856,7 +856,8 @@ static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
q->info.si_signo = sig;
q->info.si_errno = 0;
q->info.si_code = SI_USER;
- q->info.si_pid = task_pid_vnr(current);
+ q->info.si_pid = task_pid_nr_ns(current,
+ task_active_pid_ns(t));
q->info.si_uid = current_uid();
break;
case (unsigned long) SEND_SIG_PRIV:
--
1.5.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists