[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081217020601.GB2866@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:06:01 -0800
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: oleg@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, roland@...hat.com
Cc: daniel@...ac.com, bastian@...di.eu.org, xemul@...nvz.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] SEND_SIG_NOINFO: Set si_pid to tgid instead of pid
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:07:17 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] SEND_SIG_NOINFO: Set si_pid to tgid instead of pid
POSIX requires the si_pid to be the process id of the sender, so ->si_pid
should really be set to 'tgid'. This change does have following changes
in behavior:
- When sending pdeath_signal on re-parent to a sub-thread, ->si_pid
cannot be used to identify the thread that did the re-parent since
it will now show the tgid instead of thread id.
- A multi-threaded application that expects to find the specific
thread that encountered a SIGPIPE using the ->si_pid will now
break.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index d11e5f8..700d767 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
q->info.si_signo = sig;
q->info.si_errno = 0;
q->info.si_code = SI_USER;
- q->info.si_pid = task_pid_nr_ns(current,
+ q->info.si_pid = task_tgid_nr_ns(current,
task_active_pid_ns(t));
q->info.si_uid = current_uid();
break;
--
1.5.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists