linux-kernel - Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081218133621.GA4624@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:36:23 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class
	in CONFIG_LOCKDEP


* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > >> or, following #ifdef ?
> > >>
> > >> #if defined(CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ) || defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
> > >>
> > >>  /*
> > >>  * lockdep: we want to handle all irq_desc locks as a single lock-class:
> > >>  */
> > >>  static struct lock_class_key irq_desc_lock_class;
> > >
> > > instead of increasing the #ifdef jungle, how about removing some? For
> > > example is this distinction:
> > >
> > >> >  #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> > >
> > > really needed? We should use symmetric lock class annotations, regardless
> > > of how irq_desc[] is laid out.
> > 
> > it seems make much sense. I'll test your idea tommorow.
> 
> Ingo, you are right. I confirmed your idea works well.
> 
> 
> I tested following ten pattern.
> 
> o handle.c can compile without any warnings?
> 
> SPARSE_IRQ	TRACE_IRQ	LOCKDEP
> ------------------------------------------
> n		n		n
> Y		n		n
> n		Y		n
> n		n		Y
> Y		Y		n
> N		Y		Y
> Y		n		Y
> Y		Y		Y
> 
> 
> o builded kernel works well? (tested on x86_64)
> 
> SPARSE_IRQ	TRACE_IRQ	LOCKDEP
> ------------------------------------------
> n		n		n
> Y		Y		Y
> 
> 
> ==
> Subject: [PATCH] irq: remove unnecessary ifdef

Applied to tip/irq/sparseirq, thanks!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/