lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <494A5235.6090502@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:37:57 +0100
From:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] Add preadv and pwritev system calls.

  Hi,

> Please remember to add the function prototypes to
> include/linux/syscalls.h.

Done.

>> +asmlinkage ssize_t
>> +compat_sys_preadv(unsigned long fd, const struct compat_iovec __user *vec,
>> +                  unsigned long vlen, u32 pos_high, u32 pos_low)
>> +{.
>> +        loff_t pos = ((loff_t)pos_high << 32) | pos_low;
> 
> This is whitespace damaged, as are the other four functions in the
> same place.

Fixed.

>> +	struct file *file;
>> +	ssize_t ret = -EBADF;
>> +
>> +	if (pos < 0)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	file = fget(fd);
>> +	if (!file)
>> +		return -EBADF;
> 
> Any reason for using fget() here, but fget_light() in sys_preadv?

Due to the new syscalls being derived from the readv()/preadv()
versions, which have the same inconsistency.  Dunno why.  I'd suspect
the reason is that the compat syscalls tend to be overlooked when the
code is updated.  Proof: patch #1 in this series ...

I'll switch them all over in a separate followup patch.

>> +	if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	ret = -EINVAL;
>> +	if (!file->f_op || (!file->f_op->aio_read && !file->f_op->read))
>> +		goto out;
> 
> Maybe this logic could get moved into a compat_readv() function,
> similar to vfs_readv().

Yes, makes sense.

cheers,
  Gerd


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ