[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <494A5235.6090502@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:37:57 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] Add preadv and pwritev system calls.
Hi,
> Please remember to add the function prototypes to
> include/linux/syscalls.h.
Done.
>> +asmlinkage ssize_t
>> +compat_sys_preadv(unsigned long fd, const struct compat_iovec __user *vec,
>> + unsigned long vlen, u32 pos_high, u32 pos_low)
>> +{.
>> + loff_t pos = ((loff_t)pos_high << 32) | pos_low;
>
> This is whitespace damaged, as are the other four functions in the
> same place.
Fixed.
>> + struct file *file;
>> + ssize_t ret = -EBADF;
>> +
>> + if (pos < 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + file = fget(fd);
>> + if (!file)
>> + return -EBADF;
>
> Any reason for using fget() here, but fget_light() in sys_preadv?
Due to the new syscalls being derived from the readv()/preadv()
versions, which have the same inconsistency. Dunno why. I'd suspect
the reason is that the compat syscalls tend to be overlooked when the
code is updated. Proof: patch #1 in this series ...
I'll switch them all over in a separate followup patch.
>> + if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + if (!file->f_op || (!file->f_op->aio_read && !file->f_op->read))
>> + goto out;
>
> Maybe this logic could get moved into a compat_readv() function,
> similar to vfs_readv().
Yes, makes sense.
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists