linux-kernel - Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:24:20 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	steved@...hat.com, rwheeler@...hat.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:44:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Added from today.
> 
> Usual spiel: all patches in that branch must have been
> 	posted to a relevant mailing list
> 	reviewed
> 	unit tested
> 	destined for the next merge window (or the current release)
> *before* they are included.

I don't think we want fscache for .29 yet.  I'd rather let the
credential code settle for one release, and have more time for actually
reviewing it properly and have it 100% ready for .30.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/