[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081218155329.GA30546@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:53:29 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:35:02PM +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> Note that enforcing the pairing will be enabled by ARCH code. Is the
> construct you show here (two symbols covering identical code) the only
> problem you forsee? I don't want to introduce too many macro's to
> handle special cases, but this one should be solved.
Well, there are some cases where we don't have ENTRY but do have ENDPROC:
__pabt_usr:
usr_entry
...
ENTRY(ret_from_exception)
...
ENDPROC(__pabt_usr)
ENDPROC(ret_from_exception)
.macro vector_stub, name, mode, correction=0
.align 5
vector_\name:
...
ENDPROC(vector_\name)
.endm
Not sure if we have any other oddities.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists