[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812181048160.12300@quilx.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:49:07 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] kmemleak: Add the slab memory allocation/freeing
hooks
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> In the ____cache_alloc() kmemleak clears the
> cachep->array->entry[ac->avail] pointer but this may not be enough as
> freed and later re-allocated objects may have pointers in the alien
> cache (is that correct?). A better approach (haven't tried it yet) would
> be not to scan objects allocated via alloc_arraycache() at all. However,
> there is still the initarray_cache/generic which are automatically
> scanned via the data section (unless I add an attribute to place them in
> a different, not scanned, section).
An allocated object is not part of any cache in SLAB. Only freed objects
are kept in the slab queues. A freed object can only be in one queue at a
time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists