[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812180949.28042.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:49:27 -0700
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 gart: don't complain if no AMD GART found
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 01:27:24 pm Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:52:34PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > It's perfectly normal for no AMD GART to be present, e.g., if you have
> > Intel CPUs.
>
> Yes! That's annoyed me for some time too.
>
> > None of the other iommu_init() functions makes noise when
> > it finds nothing.
>
> The Calgary stuff is pretty noisy in the face of non-existant hardware too.
> Makes for noisy distro kernels..
>
> Calgary: detecting Calgary via BIOS EBDA area
> Calgary: Unable to locate Rio Grande table in EBDA - bailing!
Yeah, I considered removing that, too. At least the Calgary stuff
is KERN_DEBUG, so it's not quite as visible. But I'm in favor of
removing it anyway.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists