[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081218113729.6168.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:39:23 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_execve and sys_uselib do not call into fsnotify
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:53:20 -0500
> Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > sys_execve and sys_uselib do not call into fsnotify so inotify does not get
> > open events for these types of syscalls. This patch simply makes the
> > requisite fsnotify calls.
>
> These two functions are grovelling around in pretty low-level fs
> operations. One wonders whether they could be converted (ie: cleaned
> up) to use do_sys_open() or some other such higher-level thing.
>
> That way, this fsnotify bug would be magically fixed, too.
hmm..
In current implementaion, do_sys_open() call fd_install().
then, it cause /proc/{pid}/fd entry change. iow, compatibility break.
Yup, it is fixable. but I think Eric's implementation is simpler.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists