[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1229706478.7625.5.camel@jaswinder.satnam>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:37:58 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
perfctr-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: perf_counter.c intel_perfmon_event_map and
max_intel_perfmon_events should be static
Impact: cleanup, avoid sparse warnings, reduce kernel size a bit
Fixes these sparse warnings:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c:44:11: warning: symbol 'intel_perfmon_event_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c:54:11: warning: symbol 'max_intel_perfmon_events' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index 8a154bd..bdbdb56 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_counters {
*/
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_hw_counters, cpu_hw_counters);
-const int intel_perfmon_event_map[] =
+static const int intel_perfmon_event_map[] =
{
[PERF_COUNT_CYCLES] = 0x003c,
[PERF_COUNT_INSTRUCTIONS] = 0x00c0,
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ const int intel_perfmon_event_map[] =
[PERF_COUNT_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x00c5,
};
-const int max_intel_perfmon_events = ARRAY_SIZE(intel_perfmon_event_map);
+static const int max_intel_perfmon_events = ARRAY_SIZE(intel_perfmon_event_map);
/*
* Propagate counter elapsed time into the generic counter.
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists