linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: perf_counter.c intel_perfmon_event_map and max_intel_perfmon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081219221525.GL2351@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:15:25 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
Cc:	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	perfctr-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: perf_counter.c intel_perfmon_event_map and
	max_intel_perfmon_events should be static


* Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org> wrote:

> Impact: cleanup, avoid sparse warnings, reduce kernel size a bit
> 
> Fixes these sparse warnings:
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c:44:11: warning: symbol 'intel_perfmon_event_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c:54:11: warning: symbol 'max_intel_perfmon_events' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

applied to tip/perfcounters/core, thanks!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/