[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7A24DF798E223B4C9864E8F92E8C93EC01AAF504@SACMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:08:45 -0800
From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@...app.com>
To: "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org>, <steved@...hat.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
AFS was designed to support local disk cache, so with callbacks you can
get a consistent system. I'll ass-u-me that Linux flavors of AFS have
callbacks. It should be possible to *integrate* NFSv4.x with FS-Cache
similarly (i.e., I don't think you could drop it in as a 'black-box'
without breaking something, unless you explicitly build an independent
proxy cache server).
-Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: David Howells [mailto:dhowells@...hat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 5:21 AM
To: Muntz, Daniel
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com; Andrew Morton; sfr@...b.auug.org.au;
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org; steved@...hat.com;
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; rwheeler@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
Muntz, Daniel <Dan.Muntz@...app.com> wrote:
> Number 3 scares me. How does this play with the expected semantics of
NFS?
I don't know. Yet it's something you want to do for AFS, I think.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists