linux-kernel - Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12342.1229711059@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:24:19 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@...app.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, steved@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

Muntz, Daniel <Dan.Muntz@...app.com> wrote:

> AFS was designed to support local disk cache, so with callbacks you can get a
> consistent system.

It's less the callbacks and more the data version number that's important.

> I'll ass-u-me that Linux flavors of AFS have callbacks. 

They do.

> It should be possible to *integrate* NFSv4.x with FS-Cache similarly (i.e., I
> don't think you could drop it in as a 'black-box' without breaking something,
> unless you explicitly build an independent proxy cache server).

NFSv4 has equivalents of both the data version number and callbacks.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/