[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081219012935.GO25779@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:29:35 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
manfred@...orfullife.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schamp@....com, niv@...ibm.com,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] v9 scalable classic RCU implementation
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 02:54:03PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 05:36:59PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:10:42AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > On Power, I see a hang in all three flavors of RCU when CPU hotplug
> > > > is enabled and dynticks is not. I have not yet seen this hang on x86.
> > > > On Power, the hang occurs in the CPU-offline code, and is identical to
> > > > the hangs I was seeing in 2.6.27, except that "sleep 1" does not hang
> > > > in recent 2.6.28 versions. So the timeout is apparently failing to fire
> > > > (or being ignored) for some other reason.
> > > >
> > > > Is this similar to what you are seeing on x86?
> > >
> > > Yes it is.
> >
> > OK, then I will consider them to be the same bug for the moment.
>
> Question based on some further testing over here...
>
> Do you still get failures if you refrain from offlining CPU 0?
Yes, i never offlined cpu 0 in fact.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists