[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812191151.55607.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:51:54 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ajax@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Remove a noisy printk
On Monday 15 December 2008 06:33:53 Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:09:17PM +0100, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> > In a >normal< system one usually does not use raw sockets. So if a root
> > process do use raw socket, at least netfilter sends a notification and
> > there's a chance that someone take notice it by checking the kernel logs.
>
> 'normal' systems are irrelevant here. This message is triggerable remotely.
I don't think it can be. This is for truncated locally-generated outgoing
packets, which can only happen when root is playing with raw sockets.
As you can probably tell, I was the one who wrote this printk :) IMHO,
one reasonable complaint is sufficient to have it removed, so just remove
it. If anyone thinks it's valuable, put a static counter < 5 around it
and add pid/comm info.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists