linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC 23/23]: Support for zero-copy TCP transmit of user space data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <494D49E6.9000703@goop.org>
Date:	Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:39:18 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
CC:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC 23/23]: Support for zero-copy TCP transmit of user
 space data

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Things should work fine, since pskb_expand_head() copies whole shared
> info structure (and thus will copy destructor), get all pages and then
> copy all pointers into the new skb, and then release old skb's data.
>
> So destructor for the pages should not rely on which skb it is called on
> and check if pages are about to be really freed (i.e. check theirs
> reference counter).
>   

OK.

> __pskb_pull_tail() is tricky, it just puts some pages it does not want
> to be present in the skb, but it could be possible to add there
> destructor callback from the original skb with partial flag (or just
> having destructor with two parameters: skb and page, and if page is not
> NULL, then actually only given page is freed, otherwise the whole skb).
>   

Yes, that doesn't sound too bad.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/