[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49512BF5.2010705@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:20:37 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: traps.c replace #if CONFIG_X86_32 with #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Impact: cleanup, avoid warning in X86_64
>
> Fixes this warning in X86_64:
> CC arch/x86/kernel/traps.o
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:695:5: warning: "CONFIG_X86_32" is not defined
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index d327b53..2c00412 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ void math_error(void __user *ip)
>
> err = swd & ~cwd & 0x3f;
>
> -#if CONFIG_X86_32
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> if (!err)
> return;
> #endif
Applied to tip:x86/fpu, thanks.
Andi: you might have a perspective on this: in math_error() we bail out
if there is no error on i386, but not on x86-64. I am rather assuming
that is because it simply can't happen on x86-64 (no IRQ 13 bullshit) so
it wasn't necessary?
Thanks,
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists