linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: traps.c replace #if CONFIG_X86_32 with #ifdef CONFIG_X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081223184826.GA496@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:48:26 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: traps.c replace #if CONFIG_X86_32 with #ifdef	CONFIG_X86_32

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:20:37AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >  		return;
> >  #endif
> 
> Applied to tip:x86/fpu, thanks.
> 
> Andi: you might have a perspective on this: in math_error() we bail out
> if there is no error on i386, but not on x86-64.  I am rather assuming
> that is because it simply can't happen on x86-64 (no IRQ 13 bullshit) so
> it wasn't necessary?

Probably yes because it was not needed. Don't remember the exact circumstances,
sorry.

But dropping the #ifdef should be fine obviously.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/