| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200812231952.16171.david-b@pacbell.net> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:52:15 -0800 From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> To: me@...ipebalbi.com Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>, gregkh@...e.de, felipe.balbi@...ia.com, davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] musb: fix DaVinci build again On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > #include <linux/gpio.h> > > +#include <linux/gpio.h> > > you're including <linux/gpio.h> twice. Yeah, I suppose I just edited the patch to delete segments that *did* get merged. It looks like that change to <linux/gpio.h> got included, and "patch" didn't complain ... leaving the puzzle of just why the *rest* of that pre-2.6.27 build fix still hasn't merged. A double inclusion is a minor-but-harmless annoyance. Those <asm/arch/...> ==> <mach/...> header changes were mostly merged by 2.6.27-rc2, but ones for this particular file got stripped out. More than a small bit puzzling; I can understand patches getting dropped or lost, but not getting mangled like that. When I verify that I have a kernel booting on the DM6446 EVM in mainline, I'll resend both of the patches. They are IMO overdue to merge. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists