[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495680A7.2010900@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 11:23:19 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 byteorder.h: use __asm__/__inline__ for userspace
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> {su}{8,16,32,64} doesnt matter too much to me vs {u,}int_t{8,16,32,64}_t. as
> long as people stop using __{su}{8,16,32,64}. using the latter though does
> mean headers will more likely be "just usable" w/out needing linux/types.h
> include. but then people would be forced to include stdint.h or similar
> before a linux header ... and that sucks.
>
That is a total non-starter. This would mean that the C library itself
cannot use these headers without exporting additional symbols into the
namespace, *WHICH IT IS NOT ALLOWED TO DO*.
> unless of course we start adding appropriate C library includes for
> !__KERNEL__ ... i'd love that personally
>
>> and bool into the appropriate __{su}{8,16,32,64}
>> types and _Bool.
>
> i dont get your bool comment. the "bool" type is already a standard type.
> there is no conversion needed.
Only if <stdbool.h> is included. Again, see previous statement.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists