linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86 byteorder.h: use __asm__/__inline_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <495680F3.1040707@zytor.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Dec 2008 11:24:35 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 byteorder.h: use __asm__/__inline__ for userspace

Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> I was only thinking of a warning so we could have this part cleaned up.
> It is for the most part a trivial task to do for a volunteer.
> 

Why do a warning and then have people hack it manually?  If we do it
automatically, we should be able to get rid of *another* special rule
for user-exported headers, and make the code look more similar again.

> I could also see some sporadic use of u_int32_t - dunno where it comes from.
> But looks wrong to me.

I think it's an old BSDism.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/