[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081228094522.GD9022@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:45:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, jeremy@...p.org,
joerg.roedel@....com, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] swiotlb cleanups
* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:05:37 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> > > This is minor swiotlb cleanups. It depends on the swiotlb highmem
> > > patchset:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git swiotlb
> >
> > thanks, applied them to tip/core/iommu - after Becky's patchset as ported
> > by Jeremy.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The log of tip/core/iommu looks really wired. Two patches claim to add
> highmem support to swioblb. Becky completely reverts the Jeremy's and
> does in a different way without any description.
one is Jeremy's that was tested on Xen. The other is Becky's stuff - that
also extends it to powerpc - that is not yet fully tested though.
> As I wrote, I recommend you to reorder the patches. There is no point to
> merge Jeremy's highmem patch.
"reordering" commits is not acceptable at this stage, we do append-only
steps. If you can see any bug in the end result, let us know.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists