[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081228094605.GE9022@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:46:05 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: clean up setup_clear/force_cpu_cap handling
* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Saturday 27 December 2008 20:52:34 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Impact: fix and cleanup
> > >
> > > setup_force_cpu_cap() only have one user xen
> > > but it should not reuse cleared_cpu_cpus. it will have problem
> > > for smp.
> > >
> > > need to have cpu_cpus_set array too.
> > > also need to setup handling before all cpus cap AND
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 4 ++--
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++-
> > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> > > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Rusty, you'll carry this patch in your linux-2.6-boot-params.git tree,
> > right? Merging this in the x86 tree would just needlessly complicate your
> > logistics, right?
>
> Yep, if you're happy to ack, I'm happy to carry.
yeah. And if it breaks, that's your fault ;-)
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists