[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081228095002.GG9022@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:50:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, x86@...nel.org,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] swiotlb: use phys_addr_t for pages
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> Well, I asked Jeremy to use Becky's approach so I don't have though
>> this patchset isn't enough for Becky (possibly for Xen too) since
>> Jeremy didn't put Becky's map_single_page changes. These changes are
>> necessary to support map_map_page with highmem. I think that we can do
>> it simpler than his patch. I'll send patches to that in a different
>> way soon.
>>
>> It's not principal objection, but as I said, the patches to revert
>> Jeremy's highmem patches in this patchset like the following are
>> pointless.
>>
>
> I don't mind either way. I was hoping to go with something that I've
> actually tested, but I don't see any reason why Becky's patches won't
> work in principle for Xen. I'm on vacation at the moment, but I can
> test things out when I get back in a couple of weeks and apply whatever
> fixes are needed at whatever stage we're at then.
yes, obviously we prefer append-only - i kept your patches and added the
Becky lineup and Fujita's cleanups on top of that. If they break your Xen
swiotlb use it should all be easily bisectable.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists