linux-kernel - > There are actually more stable versions available but they are not advertised

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43d009740812290542p3e54b90avea7ccc27ec432656@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:42:13 +0700
From:	"Igor Podlesny" <for.poige+linux@...il.com>
To:	"Éric Piel" <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: > There are actually more stable versions available but they are not advertised

2008/12/29 Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>:
> Igor Podlesny schreef:
>> Actually that's either a mistake or I don't know what you guys call "a
>> stable version".
> [removing all the part which needs bug report numbers]
>
> I agree with you that the website is not very clear for someone not
> accustomed to the Linux kernel development. There are actually more
> stable versions available but they are not advertised. Maybe there
> should be more trees displayed, something like this:
> The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is:       2.6.28
> The previous stable version of the Linux kernel is:     2.6.27.10
> The latest longtime version of the Linux kernel is:     2.6.16.62

	Well, I'd call those versions stable if there were ongoing bugfixes
(if affected) backporting to it. Otherwise these are rather "outdated"
versions.

-- 
End of message. Next message?