[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43d009740812290539l3553eb75kb2126b0a3282b2b2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:39:55 +0700
From: "Igor Podlesny" <for.poige+linux@...il.com>
To: "Paul Komkoff" <i@...ngr.net>
Cc: "Éric Piel" <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is".
2008/12/29 Paul Komkoff <i@...ngr.net>:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net> wrote:
>> stable versions available but they are not advertised. Maybe there
>> should be more trees displayed, something like this:
>> The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.28
>> The previous stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.27.10
>> The latest longtime version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.16.62
>
> The latest version known to run OK on poige's hardware is: ....
>
That what http://poige.livejournal.com/tag/kernel is for :-)
> (sorry). :)
--
End of message. Next message?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists