| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <715ea5c10812290451y393dd10r5b3d8e27f74c8926@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:51:03 +0000 From: "Paul Komkoff" <i@...ngr.net> To: "Éric Piel" <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net> Cc: for.poige+linux@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is". On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net> wrote: > stable versions available but they are not advertised. Maybe there > should be more trees displayed, something like this: > The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.28 > The previous stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.27.10 > The latest longtime version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.16.62 The latest version known to run OK on poige's hardware is: .... (sorry). :) -- This message represents the official view of the voices in my head -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists