linux-kernel - Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <11990.1230560791@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:26:31 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steved@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> What was the result of discussions around FS-Cache?  I ask because it
> reappeared in linux-next today via the nfs tree (merged into that on Dec
> 24 and 25) ...

That is the result of discussions during the kernel summit in Portland.  The
discussion here is about whether Andrew agrees with adding the patches or not,
as far as I can tell.  There are a number of people/companies who want them;
there is Andrew who does not.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/