linux-kernel - Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081229162618.e2fea7a9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:26:18 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steved@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

Hi Andrew, Trond,

On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:07:26 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> And that of course means that many many 2.6.28 patches which I am
> maintaining will need significant rework to apply on top of linux-next,
> and then they won't apply to mainline.  Or that linux-next will not apply
> on top of those patches.  Mainly memory management.
> 
> Please drop the NFS tree until after -rc1.

OK, it is dropped for now (including today's tree).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped