[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081228200726.7b7078b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:07:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steved@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:45:33 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> I ask because it
> reappeared in linux-next today via the nfs tree (merged into that on Dec
> 24 and 25) ...
And that of course means that many many 2.6.28 patches which I am
maintaining will need significant rework to apply on top of linux-next,
and then they won't apply to mainline. Or that linux-next will not apply
on top of those patches. Mainly memory management.
Please drop the NFS tree until after -rc1.
Guys, this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/27/173
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists