[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49590C65.3060804@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:44:05 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 byteorder.h: use __asm__/__inline__ for userspace
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 27 December 2008 16:09:52 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> ...
>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> # define kernel_flock flock
>>> #endif
>>> struct kernel_flock {
>>> ...
>> FWIW, a long time ago I proposed the __kabi_ prefix for these things; I
>> think it is a good thing to make userspace-visible structures stand out
>> even in the kernel code itself.
>>
>> As such, I would suggest *not* adding the #define at all.
>
> the convention based on linux/types.h seems to be to use __kernel_ as the
> prefix, but it doesnt matter to me whether it's __kabi_ or __kernel_. i'll
> start doing the latter though in the hopes it'll be less scary ;).
Agreed, the actual prefix doesn't matter. I suggested __kabi to be more
explicit about the fact that it is an exported ABI, but I think the main
thing is to not #define it out.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists