lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:04:38 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: mingo@...e.hu Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, emil.s.tantilov@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, dada1@...mosbay.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:56:50 +0100 > > * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > > > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100 > > > > > One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher > > > who reported the problem originally: > > > > > > Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> > > > > I'll make sure to add that to the commit message after > > you successfully test Herbert's patch. > > > > Thanks. > > early indications are good: after about 15 random bootup tests the lockdep > warning has not triggered. (it would trigger on every 2nd kernel before > that - there's a 66% chance for lockdep to be enabled in my randconfig > tests) Sounds good. I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree, with Jeff's reported-by and your Tested-by, and send this off to Linus tonight. Thanks everyone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists