[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081230072125.GB20225@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:21:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
emil.s.tantilov@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, dada1@...mosbay.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock
classes
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:56:50 +0100
>
> >
> > * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100
> > >
> > > > One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher
> > > > who reported the problem originally:
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> > >
> > > I'll make sure to add that to the commit message after
> > > you successfully test Herbert's patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > early indications are good: after about 15 random bootup tests the lockdep
> > warning has not triggered. (it would trigger on every 2nd kernel before
> > that - there's a 66% chance for lockdep to be enabled in my randconfig
> > tests)
>
> Sounds good. I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree, with Jeff's
> reported-by and your Tested-by, and send this off to Linus tonight.
cool. If by tonight you dont get a followup mail from me then you can
assume that the patch passed hundreds of tests here.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists