[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812311318420.5086@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:22:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-parisc <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Randolph Chung <randolph@...sq.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
John David Anglin <dave@...uly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: fix module loading failure of large kernel
modules (take 4)
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Adrian claimed that it was gcc-4.1.0 and 4.1.1 only. He proposed
> banning them: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/5/444
If it really is just those releases, then yes, considering the number of
cases we apparently have, and considering how ugly it is in some cases to
move the weak function anywhere else, maybe banning those versions is the
proper thing to do.
It probably won't hurt very many people - yeah, some people will be forced
to upgrade, but I have this memory of early 4.1 having had other bugs
anyway, so it's probably a good idea.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists